T91 Mil-Spec --- Coming Soon!
Moderators: e292644, blueeyedwolf
-
- II
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 12:37 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: WI
Any word on pricing and availability? Also, will complete T91 lowers (with stock) or just the lower itself be available for people who already have the upper?
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
Price won't be available until late September.
There will be options for either stripped or complete serialized lower and other parts as well.
There will be options for either stripped or complete serialized lower and other parts as well.
Kartoffelkopf wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 6:29 pm Any word on pricing and availability? Also, will complete T91 lowers (with stock) or just the lower itself be available for people who already have the upper?
-
- II
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:32 am
- Country: USA
- Location: California
You mentioned that the 16" barrel would be most "clone correct" for a T91 - would it still be able to mount a bayonet? (Are original ROC issue barrels 16", or 14.5" in length, not counting the flash hider?)
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
The 16" barrel will be the correct clone profile due to the regulation, original ROC issue are 14.5" without flash hider. Will get back to you here on the bayonet availability.
Firebolt1176 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:00 pm You mentioned that the 16" barrel would be most "clone correct" for a T91 - would it still be able to mount a bayonet? (Are original ROC issue barrels 16", or 14.5" in length, not counting the flash hider?)
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
The 16" barrel will be the correct clone profile due to the regulation, original ROC issue are 14.5" without flash hider. Will get back to you here on the bayonet availability.
Firebolt1176 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:00 pm You mentioned that the 16" barrel would be most "clone correct" for a T91 - would it still be able to mount a bayonet? (Are original ROC issue barrels 16", or 14.5" in length, not counting the flash hider?)
-
- II
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 1:32 am
- Country: USA
- Location: California
Gotcha. Would you potentially be able to offer a rifle with a clone correct profile 14.5" barrel with the flash hider pinned/welded for 16" overall, to meet NFA laws? Really would love an identical clone to the T91, down to being able to throw on a bayonet.
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
Will work on it.
Firebolt1176 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:26 pm Gotcha. Would you potentially be able to offer a rifle with a clone correct profile 14.5" barrel with the flash hider pinned/welded for 16" overall, to meet NFA laws? Really would love an identical clone to the T91, down to being able to throw on a bayonet.
-
- L
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:00 pm
I am in the opposite camp. No clone interest at all.
I would like the slim or heavy in 14.5 but the muzzle device left unpinned (upper only).
I will be responsible for attaching the muzzle device per NFA.
If this is not permissible, then a MIL SPEC A2 flash hider shall be installed and preferably one I supply to ensure it is compatible with my A2 mountable devices.
![onion7 @onion7@](./images/smilies/onion7.gif)
I would like the slim or heavy in 14.5 but the muzzle device left unpinned (upper only).
I will be responsible for attaching the muzzle device per NFA.
If this is not permissible, then a MIL SPEC A2 flash hider shall be installed and preferably one I supply to ensure it is compatible with my A2 mountable devices.
![onion7 @onion7@](./images/smilies/onion7.gif)
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
It’s confirmed bayonet lug will be the standard configuration.
Firebolt1176 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:00 pm You mentioned that the 16" barrel would be most "clone correct" for a T91 - would it still be able to mount a bayonet? (Are original ROC issue barrels 16", or 14.5" in length, not counting the flash hider?)
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
-
- II
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2019 12:37 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: WI
Hello again. I just wanted to check if this is any closer to production and or if you're able to share a projected price yet. Thanks!
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
We are working on the complete T91 upper right now (16" Slim, 14.5" Heavy, and 12.5" Heavy Barrel).
We will release limited quantity before/after the Shot Show. Final price will released here at our users forum first before they hit the web store.
We will release limited quantity before/after the Shot Show. Final price will released here at our users forum first before they hit the web store.
Kartoffelkopf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:32 pm Hello again. I just wanted to check if this is any closer to production and or if you're able to share a projected price yet. Thanks!
- e292644
- Site Admin
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:47 pm
- Country: USA
- Location: AZ
- Contact:
Limited quantity of T91 Chrome Lined Barrel assembly Released.
Fully assembled with T91 Mil-Spec Front Sight Base with bayonet lug and picatinny rail.
T91-16 inch Slim Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
T91-14.5 inch Heavy Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
T91-12.5 inch Heavy Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
** Note: T91-Bayonet ONLY work on 14.5" barrel **
Fully assembled with T91 Mil-Spec Front Sight Base with bayonet lug and picatinny rail.
T91-16 inch Slim Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
T91-14.5 inch Heavy Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
T91-12.5 inch Heavy Profile Chrome Lined Barrel Assembly
** Note: T91-Bayonet ONLY work on 14.5" barrel **